Denied-party screening audit analytics
A broker made its screening coverage provable, with an auditable record that every party on every entry was checked.
- Coverage
- 100%
- parties and entries
- Audit answer
- Minutes
- from days
- Match disposition
- Tracked
- end to end
- Trail
- Complete
- per decision
Illustrative scenario · example figures
The challenge
Screening happened across tools and inboxes, so proving that every counterparty had been checked meant a manual hunt whenever an auditor or client asked.
What we built
We consolidated screening events against entries and parties into one model that shows coverage, hits, and the disposition of every match, with a complete audit trail.
- Screening coverage tied to every party on every entry.
- Hit and false-positive analysis with disposition tracking.
- An audit view that reconstructs any screening decision on demand.
Outcomes
- Screening coverage is provable instead of assumed.
- Audits are answered from a report, not a manual hunt.
- False-positive handling is measured and tuned.
Where the data came from
Data is drawn from the systems the operation already runs on and delivered in the client’s own tenant.
Want this on your trade data?
Tell us where your numbers live and what leadership needs to see. You get a scoped plan and a quote within one business day.
Request a quote